![]() In this article, we’ve found the best free video players/media players that make it easy to play videos - no codes or troubleshooting required. When choosing a video player for Windows, your primary consideration should be the ability to play the widest range of video and audio files, without downloading any plug-ins. All of this is time-consuming and takes up space on your computer, causing everything to run slowly. You can install plug-ins and codecs to improve compatibility, but some videos might remain out of reach. Relying on the installed video player could cause you to need multiple players - one to play music, one to play DVDs, one to play videos, and one for streaming - because it can’t handle the files. These built-in video players/media players only support a limited range of formats, meaning that half of the time you can’t even open the files you need. I get that they're working on it.Since most computers come installed with a video player, why would anyone hassle with downloading a third-party software? Simple. Knowing what you know, you can imagine the ensuing s*** storm. Or so I thought until he came back with installation issues (conflicting) and that he needed Chromecast (not available on his apt-get v2 version) and a dark theme (10 yr old skin2 skins for v2 and completely undocumented v3 skin implementation). And, frankly the only reason I even noticed issues was after mentioning to a Linux newbie friend that he should get VLC. I sound like a psycho for complaining this much about something as minor as one app's documentation. Sudo apt-get install vlc vlc-plugin-pulse mozilla-plugin-vlcĪnd, being as informed as you obviously are, I'm sure you are aware that this is just one example of how slipshod vlc support/documentation looks. Ubuntu Install ( ) sudo snap install vlc Ditto on having conflicting installation instructions. For an app as high up the food-chain as VLC, having essentially defunct skins2 and the Skins Editor front and center on the site (no matter what might or might not happen in the future) is bad form. Thanks for the info! And, I truly apologize for ranting.īut, I would suggest to - as probably the #1 cross-platform video player in most people's books - that they kick that "huge effort" on documentation into higher gear. I made the skin editor compile again a few month ago, but yes it's quite in low maintenance mode too. Hopefully, skins2 will transform in upcoming major releases to use the work that has been done elsewhere in the software and earn new features for this. ![]() VLC is a very complex software made to be lightweight and complete, depending on what is installed on the system and supporting almost everything, and stems from the original work of students so unfortunately the pace between two majors versions is quite slow as there is a lot of work. It was especially true for VLC 3 because it introduced hardware decoding by default, and basically revealed a lot of issues in a lot of drivers/graphics layers and often broke, so it took time to have it everywhere but it's currently quite done. In general, debian distro are lagging behind in term of packaging. It's still pretty work-in-progress but it shows that there is quite some attention paid to this. The skins2 somehow survived this for next version, but it's quite in a low maintenance mode at the moment.Ībout the documentation, there are huge efforts put in place currently to have a real user-friendly documentation here : Skins2 is a different interface module than the Qt one, and the focus of the last two years has been on rewriting the Qt interface and all the underlying layers in the core. But, even the fact that some major debian distros are so far behind is kind of weird in itself isn't it?Īnyway, back to my original question: What is up with the skin thing? Can someone who spends more time than I collecting info on what goes on in VLC world tell me why the skin thing seems to have died out? Or at least why so little attention is being paid to it? WTF?!?! Is VLC dying out? What gives with the crappy documentation for this stuff? Now, I know it's up to the distro in question to decide when to update app versions in their package managers. In fact, if I had left it up to, I would have lived with VLC 2x apparently until I died of old age. I finally discovered that Snap had it.a fact covered NOWHERE on the VLC site or in any tutorial or post I could easily find. Not to mention the fact that even getting VLC 3x at all for debian (or any other debian based distro for that matter) was a giant pain in the ass. The skin installation instructions on the official skins page doesn't take into account the fact that, at least in VLC 3x, the default way of installing skins is now through "Plugins and Extensions" instead of downloading them directly. The VLC skin editor doesn't look like it's been touched in a decade.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |